Sunday, September 5, 2010

Why do people decide to abort innocent lives instead of giving them up for adoption?

What I don't get is how anyone could be "anti-life" as such. After looking at Yahoo Answers, most of the people who answer questions to do with abortion say that it is a good thing in ALL cases! People who agree with abortion normally says these things:

1)"Oh the baby isn't even alive yet!" - This has not been proven true by science. People say that babies would not be able to feel it, but as the point when life begins has not been proven yet, how do you know?

2)"That baby could grow up to be the next Hitler, etc...." - This is very unlikely, and you haven't even given the baby a chance to prove itself! Were you killed as an infant because of the possibility you could be a tyrant? If you're reading this, then no.

3) "Adoption is potentially dangerous for the child." - Um, and killing it isn't?

4)" Unplanned pregnancies should be terminated because of financial reasons or because the parents are too young ." - Adoption is potentially a kinder option to the child.


So, having put these issues forward, can someone please justify why abortion is legal? I don't mean abortion for serious cases such as medical and traumatic reasons, I'm talking about the vast majority of abortions which carry no physical threat to the mother. Why do people decide to abort their children instead of adoption?

You clearly have never stepped into an orphanage.

No one loves them, no one wants them, they have nothing.


You make it sound as if every child gets adopted. They don't. Once they reach the age of 5, no one wants them. Once they turn 18 they get kicked out onto the streets to fend for themselves.


They have issues. They don't understand how to socialise, how to trust, how to love. They cannot understand and they have some real issues due to the frustration.



There are things worse than death you know...




No comments:

Post a Comment